The immediate case shows once again the dangers of the current complex structuring of insurance policies. Unfortunately, the insurance industry is addicted to the practice of constructing a condition or exception in the form of a Babel language tower in the policies. We join other courts and deplore a trend that plunges policyholders into a state of insecurity and places the task of resolving it on justice. We reaffirm our advocacy for clarity and simplicity in policies that serve such an important public service.  In 1941, the insurance industry, To move to the current system, in which the risks covered are defined first generally in an “all risk” or “all sums” in order to guarantee agreement on a form of general insurance (e.g.B. “We pay all the sums that the insured must pay legally as damages… and then by subsequent exclusion clauses (for example. B, “this insurance does not apply…  If the insured wants coverage for a risk taken by an exclusion on the standard form, the insured may sometimes pay an additional premium for the approval of the policy that suspends the exclusion. For the vast majority of insurance policies, the only page that is highly tailored to the insured`s needs is the declaration page. All other pages are standard forms that, if necessary, refer to terms defined in the returns. Certain types of insurance, such as .B. However, media insurance is written in the form of handwritten policies, written either from new bases or from a mixture of standard and non-standard forms.   By analogy, instruction notes that are not on standard forms or whose language is adapted to the particular circumstances of the insured are called manuscript notes. Insurance contracts have traditionally been written on the basis of each type of risk (for which risks have been defined very precisely) and a separate premium is calculated and charged for each of them.
Only the specific risks expressly described or “considered” in the directive were covered; This is why these guidelines are now referred to as “individual” or “schedule” guidelines.  This system of “designated hazards” or “specific dangers” proved untenable in the context of the Second Industrial Revolution, as a typical large conglomerate could have dozens of types of risks that can be insured against. For example, in 1926, a spokesperson for the insurance industry indicated that a bakery had to purchase a separate policy for each of the following risks: manufacturing operations, elevators, teamsters, product liability, contractual liability (for a track that connects the bakery to a nearby railway), domestic liability (for a retail store) and the responsibility of protecting owners (negligence of contractors responsible for construction modifications).  The insurance policy is generally an integrated contract, that is, it covers all forms related to the agreement between the insured and the insurer. 10 However, in some cases, additional writings, such as letters sent after the final agreement, may make the insurance policy an un integrated contract. :11 An insurance manual states that, as a general rule, “the courts take into account all previous negotiations or agreements … any contractual clause in the policy at the time of delivery, as well as those who then wrote as political riders and notes … With the agreement of both parties, they are part of the written policy.  The manual also states that policy must refer to all documents that are part of the policy.  Oral agreements are subject to the rule of evidence and cannot be considered part of the directive if the contract appears to be a full right.